Celeron J3355 vs Ryzen 3 3200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.48
+497%
Celeron J3355
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.75

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron J3355 by a whopping 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13272663
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.900.06
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency6.527.10
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3200G has 14733% better value for money than Celeron J3355.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier3620
L1 cache96 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 8Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes206
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.48
+497%
Celeron J3355 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7124
+495%
Celeron J3355 1197

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3200G 1076
+294%
Celeron J3355 273

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3200G 3063
+566%
Celeron J3355 460

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.48 0.75
Integrated graphics card 4.51 0.77
Recency 7 July 2019 30 August 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen 3 3200G has a 497.3% higher aggregate performance score, 485.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J3355, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron J3355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3193 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or Celeron J3355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.