Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Ryzen 3 3100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 3 3100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads
7.71

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by a whopping 424% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking87060
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.0347.99
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesMatisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date24 April 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$699
Current price$140 (1.4x MSRP)$938 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 55% better value for money than Ryzen 3 3100.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus supportno data64K (per core)
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm
Die size74 mm22x 71 mm (CCD) sq. mm + 121 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C47 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3100 7.71
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 40.43
+424%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 424% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 3100 11928
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 62528
+424%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 424% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 3100 1482
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2919
+97%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 97% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 3100 5092
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 19632
+286%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 286% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 3 3100 5181
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16551
+219%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 219% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 3100 23406
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 138015
+490%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 490% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 3 3100 6.58
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 2.01
+227%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X3D by 227% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 3100 11
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 65
+491%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 491% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 3100 991
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 5974
+503%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 503% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 3100 178
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 326
+83.1%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 83% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 3 3100 1.99
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 3.86
+94%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 94% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 5.4
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 26.9
+398%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 398% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 4848
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 15779
+225%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 225% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 203
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 393
+93.8%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 94% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 59
Ryzen 9 7950X3D 266
+353%

Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 353% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.71 40.43
Recency 24 April 2020 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Cost $99 $699
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1528 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 980 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3100 or Ryzen 9 7950X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.