Ryzen 5 7545U vs Ryzen 3 2300U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1524 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.07 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 8 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 2 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 137 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 3.04 | 8.26 |
| Recency | 8 January 2018 | 2 November 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 3 2300U has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 7545U, on the other hand, has 171.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2300U and Ryzen 5 7545U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
