EPYC 9124 vs Ryzen 3 2200U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.03
EPYC 9124
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
24.85
+1124%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U by a whopping 1124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2029235
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.94
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.745.27
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date8 January 2018 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200U and EPYC 9124 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier2530
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size210 mm24x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,950 million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and EPYC 9124 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and EPYC 9124. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and EPYC 9124 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and EPYC 9124. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and EPYC 9124.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 2200U 2.03
EPYC 9124 24.85
+1124%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3583
EPYC 9124 43846
+1124%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 2200U 794
EPYC 9124 1767
+123%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 2200U 1597
EPYC 9124 12262
+668%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.03 24.85
Recency 8 January 2018 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200U has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9124, on the other hand, has a 1124.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 9124 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 2200U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9124 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U
AMD EPYC 9124
EPYC 9124

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 559 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate EPYC 9124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 2200U and EPYC 9124, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.