i3-350M vs Ryzen 3 2200U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.34
+230%

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms Core i3-350M by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18122713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Core i3
Power efficiency14.221.85
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$130

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier2517
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Number of transistors4950 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200U 2.34
+230%
i3-350M 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3583
+230%
i3-350M 1085

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 2200U 789
+169%
i3-350M 293

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 2200U 1595
+169%
i3-350M 594

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3978
+62.1%
i3-350M 2453

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 3 2200U 7776
+33.1%
i3-350M 5843

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3387
+43.1%
i3-350M 2366

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 3 2200U 14.27
+58.4%
i3-350M 22.61

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3
+59.9%
i3-350M 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.34 0.71
Recency 8 January 2018 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200U has a 229.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 2200U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-350M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i3-350M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U
Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 534 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 263 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200U or Core i3-350M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.