A10-4600M vs Ryzen 3 2200U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200U
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.32
+85.6%

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17192216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$549 $222

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors4500 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon HD 7660G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200U 2.32
+85.6%
A10-4600M 1.25

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 2200U 3583
+85.6%
A10-4600M 1931

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 86% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 2200U 775
+127%
A10-4600M 342

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 127% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 2200U 1539
+110%
A10-4600M 733

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 110% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 3 2200U 3978
+91.4%
A10-4600M 2078

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 91% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 2200U 7776
+36.5%
A10-4600M 5696

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 2200U 3387
+18.2%
A10-4600M 2866

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 18% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 3 2200U 14.27
+85.6%
A10-4600M 26.49

A10-4600M outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U by 86% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 2200U 3
+48.8%
A10-4600M 2

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 49% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 2200U 312
+66.8%
A10-4600M 187

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 67% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 2200U 117
+85.7%
A10-4600M 63

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 86% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 3 2200U 1.15
+64.3%
A10-4600M 0.7

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 64% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200U 2.1
+75%
A10-4600M 1.2

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 75% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200U 1545
A10-4600M 1892
+22.4%

A10-4600M outperforms Ryzen 3 2200U by 22% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200U 18
+35.9%
A10-4600M 13

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 36% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200U 92
+59.9%
A10-4600M 58

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 60% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 3 2200U 7422
+56.9%
A10-4600M 4729

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms A10-4600M by 57% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 1.25
Integrated graphics card 2.97 1.22
Recency 26 October 2017 15 May 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 3 2200U is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4600M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200U and A10-4600M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U
AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 520 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 483 votes

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200U or A10-4600M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.