Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen 3 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.20
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
30.59
+628%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by a whopping 628% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1475161
Place by popularity65not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency6.1953.27
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2019)Strix Halo (2025)
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache128K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size210 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP11
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon 8060S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 2200G 4.20
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 30.59
+628%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200G 6745
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 49073
+628%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 2200G 4882
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 22023
+351%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 2200G 3948
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 6540
+65.7%

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 2200G 14790
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 121368
+721%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.20 30.59
Integrated graphics card 4.12 38.36
Recency 12 February 2018 6 January 2025
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a 628.3% higher aggregate performance score, 831.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2521 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 45 votes

Rate Ryzen AI Max 395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen AI Max+ 395, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.