Ryzen 7 5825U vs Ryzen 3 2200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.37
Ryzen 7 5825U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.89
+172%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by a whopping 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1262592
Place by popularity87not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.56no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Barcelo-U (Zen 3)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data
Current price$117 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200G 4.37
Ryzen 7 5825U 11.89
+172%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 172% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 2200G 6764
Ryzen 7 5825U 18385
+172%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 172% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 2200G 998
Ryzen 7 5825U 1668
+67.1%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 67% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 2200G 2860
Ryzen 7 5825U 6254
+119%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 119% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 3 2200G 4625
Ryzen 7 5825U 6304
+36.3%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 36% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 2200G 16684
Ryzen 7 5825U 32641
+95.6%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 96% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 2200G 6636
Ryzen 7 5825U 11292
+70.2%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 70% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 3 2200G 10.8
Ryzen 7 5825U 9.2
+17.4%

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Ryzen 7 5825U by 17% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 2200G 7
Ryzen 7 5825U 19
+179%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 179% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 2200G 577
Ryzen 7 5825U 1778
+208%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 208% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 2200G 146
Ryzen 7 5825U 232
+59.1%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 59% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 3 2200G 1.68
Ryzen 7 5825U 2.75
+63.7%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 64% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200G 3.1
Ryzen 7 5825U 8.7
+181%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 181% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200G 3229
Ryzen 7 5825U 5835
+80.7%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 81% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200G 40
Ryzen 7 5825U 100
+153%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 153% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 2200G 184
Ryzen 7 5825U 250
+35.7%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by 36% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.37 11.89
Integrated graphics card 4.49 9.07
Recency 8 January 2018 6 January 2022
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 7 5825U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 5825U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2096 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 597 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200G or Ryzen 7 5825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.