Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1378 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.79 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Ryzen 3 |
Power efficiency | 6.19 | no data |
Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 8 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Multiplier | 35 | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 4500 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 4.51 | 2.98 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 2200G has 51.3% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores.
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.