i9-9820X vs Ryzen 3 2200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.25
Core i9-9820X
2018
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
12.72
+199%

Core i9-9820X outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1368598
Place by popularity91not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.794.85
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Core i9
Power efficiency6.197.30
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)19 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$898

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 2200G has 81% better value for money than i9-9820X.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3533
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data92 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1244

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200G 4.25
i9-9820X 12.72
+199%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200G 6755
i9-9820X 20210
+199%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 12.72
Recency 12 February 2018 19 October 2018
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200G has 153.8% lower power consumption.

i9-9820X, on the other hand, has a 199.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Core i9-9820X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2200G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and Core i9-9820X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i9-9820X
Core i9-9820X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2284 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 44 votes

Rate Core i9-9820X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200G or Core i9-9820X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.