Athlon 64 X2 4200+ vs Ryzen 3 2200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1282not rated
Place by popularity71not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)December 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$309
Current price$117 (1.2x MSRP)$119 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache384 KB256K
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size209.78 mm2220 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4939
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 2200G 6764
+845%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 716

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4200+ by 845% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 2200G 995
+507%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 164

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4200+ by 507% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 2200G 2849
+925%
Athlon 64 X2 4200+ 278

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4200+ by 925% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $99 $309
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 89 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and Athlon 64 X2 4200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2121 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 144 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200G or Athlon 64 X2 4200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.