A6-3430MX vs Ryzen 3 2200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.38
+366%

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms A6-3430MX by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13412490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)8 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache384 KB512 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2218 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million1000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FS1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon HD 6520G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200G 4.38
+366%
A6-3430MX 0.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200G 6760
+367%
A6-3430MX 1448

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 2200G 996
+292%
A6-3430MX 254

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 2200G 2837
+317%
A6-3430MX 681

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.38 0.94
Integrated graphics card 4.50 0.78
Recency 8 January 2018 8 December 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200G has a 366% higher aggregate performance score, 476.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A6-3430MX, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3430MX in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop processor while A6-3430MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and A6-3430MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD A6-3430MX
A6-3430MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2179 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 40 votes

Rate A6-3430MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200G or A6-3430MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.