5 320 vs Ryzen 3 210
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1142 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 11.62 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) | 16 April 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $340 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 210 and Core 5 320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 137 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 20,900 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 210 and Core 5 320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP7 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 210 and Core 5 320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 210 and Core 5 320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 210 and Core 5 320 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 210 and Core 5 320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 210 and Core 5 320.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 14 | 6 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 16 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 210 has 33% more threads.
Core 5 320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 87% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 3 210 and Intel Core 5 320. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
