Xeon 6747P vs Ryzen 3 1300X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1300X
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.94
Xeon 6747P
2025
48 cores / 96 threads, 330 Watt
57.45
+1358%

Xeon 6747P outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X by a whopping 1358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking155228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.82no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency2.567.36
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date27 July 2017 (8 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)288 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s)
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes2088

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 1300X 3.94
Xeon 6747P 57.45
+1358%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 3 1300X 6924
Samples: 449
Xeon 6747P 100964
+1358%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.94 57.45
Recency 27 July 2017 1 January 2025
Physical cores 4 48
Threads 4 96
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 330 Watt

Ryzen 3 1300X has 407.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6747P, on the other hand, has a 1358.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6747P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop processor while Xeon 6747P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
Intel Xeon 6747P
Xeon 6747P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 290 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6747P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon 6747P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.