Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Ryzen 3 1300X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1300X
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.39
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.19

Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13521391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.94no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency6.3926.44
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3420
L1 cache96K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1300X 4.39
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 1300X 6974
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6657

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 1300X 1101
+25.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 875

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 1300X 3125
+21.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2565

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 3 1300X 4676
+7.5%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4349

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 3 1300X 16094
+12.3%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 14336

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 3 1300X 6310
+12%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 3 1300X 10.8
+14.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12.36

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 3 1300X 6
+4.8%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 1300X 558
+0.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 553

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 1300X 152
+13.4%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 134

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 1300X 1.72
+11%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1.55

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 3 1300X 3
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3.4
+13.3%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 3 1300X 2677
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2700
+0.8%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 3 1300X 38
+13.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 34

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 3 1300X 182
+85.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 98

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 3 1300X 5210
+66.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3135

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 1300X 870
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 1007
+15.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 3 1300X 920
+3.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 887

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 1300X 3772
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4102
+8.7%

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 1300X 13712
+391%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2794

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Ryzen 3 1300X 11803
+20.9%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 9760

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Ryzen 3 1300X 4250
+22.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 3480

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.39 4.19
Recency 27 July 2017 26 October 2017
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 1300X has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, 100% more threads, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.

Note that Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 278 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 121 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1300X or Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.