FX PRO-8800P vs Ryzen 3 1300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| Release date | 11 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 2 June 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 1300 and FX PRO-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 320 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 250 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 3,100 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 1300 and FX PRO-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and FX PRO-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and FX PRO-8800P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and FX PRO-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R7 8CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and FX PRO-8800P.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 April 2017 | 2 June 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 1300 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
FX PRO-8800P, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 3 1300 and AMD FX PRO-8800P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 1300 is a desktop processor while FX PRO-8800P is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
