EPYC Embedded 9654 vs Ryzen 3 1300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 11 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 14 March 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 1300 and EPYC Embedded 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 12x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 78,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 1300 and EPYC Embedded 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM4 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 360 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and EPYC Embedded 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and EPYC Embedded 9654 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and EPYC Embedded 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1300 and EPYC Embedded 9654.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 April 2017 | 14 March 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 360 Watt |
Ryzen 3 1300 has 453.8% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 9654, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 3 1300 and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 1300 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 9654 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
