Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Ryzen 3 1200
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1327 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 99 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.03 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Architecture codename | Summit Ridge (Zen) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 27 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 28 July 2006 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $286 |
| Current price | $352 (3.2x MSRP) | $38 (0.1x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0375V-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 34 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | DDR4-2667 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7200 by 768% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7200 by 357% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7200 by 733% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7200 by 216% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 July 2017 | 28 July 2006 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Cost | $109 | $286 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 34 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 1200 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo T7200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and Core 2 Duo T7200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
