Athlon II X4 615e vs Ryzen 3 1200

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 1200
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.03
+220%
Athlon II X4 615e
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.26

Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Athlon II X4 615e by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14082293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.204.23
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency5.872.65
Architecture codenameSummit Ridge (Zen) (2017)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109$59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X4 615e has 1% better value for money than Ryzen 3 1200.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache384 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm2169 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors4800 Million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 1200 4.03
+220%
Athlon II X4 615e 1.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 1200 6407
+220%
Athlon II X4 615e 2000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.03 1.26
Recency 27 July 2017 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 3 1200 has a 219.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II X4 615e, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 615e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X4 615e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 1200
AMD Athlon II X4 615e
Athlon II X4 615e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2800 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 615e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 1200 or Athlon II X4 615e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.