Athlon II X2 260 vs Ryzen 3 1200

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1424	2682
Place by popularity	97	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.97	3.72
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Ryzen 3	no data
Power efficiency	5.86	1.08
Architecture codename	Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017)	Regor (2009−2013)
Release date	27 July 2017 (7 years ago)	11 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	$48

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 1200 has 7% better value for money than Athlon II X2 260.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	3.2 GHz
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	31	no data
L1 cache	96K (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512K (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Die size	192 mm2	117 mm2
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	no data
Number of transistors	4,800 million	410 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	AM4	AM3
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	42.671 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.00	0.74
Recency	27 July 2017	11 May 2010
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 1200 and Athlon II X2 260, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---