Xeon Platinum 8592+ vs Processor U300
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8592+ outperforms Processor U300 by a whopping 858% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1426 | 61 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.58 | 1.13 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-U | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.10 | 5.79 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $11,600 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Processor U300 has 1456% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8592+.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Processor U300 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 55 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 320 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor U300 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor U300 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Processor U300 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor U300 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor U300 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor U300 and Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.01 | 47.98 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 5 | 64 |
| Threads | 6 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 350 Watt |
Processor U300 has 2233.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8592+, on the other hand, has a 857.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 1180% more physical cores and 2033.3% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor U300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor U300 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8592+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
