Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs Processor U300
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 outperforms Processor U300 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1392 | 1187 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-U | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 35.62 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Processor U300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 55 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor U300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4 MB + 8 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor U300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Processor U300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor U300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor U300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor U300 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.98 | 6.89 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.32 | 7.28 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 5 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4 Watt |
Processor U300 has 25% more physical cores.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210, on the other hand, has a 38.4% higher aggregate performance score, 68.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 33.3% more threads, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor U300 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
