Processor CC150 vs Processor U300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1332 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.23 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-U | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.33 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Processor U300 and Processor CC150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 55 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180.3 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor U300 and Processor CC150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor U300 and Processor CC150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Processor U300 and Processor CC150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor U300 and Processor CC150 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor U300 and Processor CC150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor U300 and Processor CC150.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 5 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Processor U300 has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
Processor CC150, on the other hand, has 60% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Processor U300 and Intel Processor CC150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Processor U300 is a notebook processor while Processor CC150 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
