Athlon XP-M 2100+ vs Processor U300
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1431 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.44 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Raptor Lake-U | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 14.06 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 17 March 2004 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $97 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Processor U300 and Athlon XP-M 2100+: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 55 MHz | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 12 |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 101 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor U300 and Athlon XP-M 2100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor U300 and Athlon XP-M 2100+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Processor U300 and Athlon XP-M 2100+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor U300 and Athlon XP-M 2100+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor U300 and Athlon XP-M 2100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor U300 and Athlon XP-M 2100+.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 17 March 2004 |
| Physical cores | 5 | 1 |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Processor U300 has an age advantage of 18 years, 400% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Processor U300 and AMD Athlon XP-M 2100+. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
