Ryzen 3 7320C vs Processor N97
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 7320C outperforms Processor N97 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1540 | 1152 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
Power efficiency | 27.20 | 34.22 |
Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 20 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.58 | 5.63 |
Integrated graphics card | 2.32 | 2.85 |
Recency | 3 January 2023 | 20 September 2022 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
Processor N97 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 25% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 7320C, on the other hand, has a 57.3% higher aggregate performance score, 22.8% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 3 7320C is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N97 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N97 and Ryzen 3 7320C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.