Opteron 6308 vs Processor N50
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2352 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 10.91 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 5 November 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $501 |
Detailed specifications
Processor N50 and Opteron 6308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 8 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N50 and Opteron 6308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | G34 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N50 and Opteron 6308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Processor N50 and Opteron 6308 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N50 and Opteron 6308 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N50 and Opteron 6308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N50 and Opteron 6308.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 5 November 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 115 Watt |
Processor N50 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1816.7% lower power consumption.
Opteron 6308, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Processor N50 and AMD Opteron 6308. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Processor N50 is a notebook processor while Opteron 6308 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
