Xeon 638 vs Processor N250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1838not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency21.89no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameTwin Lake (2024−2025)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date7 January 2025 (1 year ago)2 February 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

Processor N250 and Xeon 638 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data16
Threads432
Base clock speed0.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cache96 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)72 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 3 nm
Die sizeno data598 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Processor N250 and Xeon 638 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N250 and Xeon 638. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Processor N250 and Xeon 638 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N250 and Xeon 638 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N250 and Xeon 638. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 730N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N250 and Xeon 638.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes980

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2025 2 February 2026
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 180 Watt

Processor N250 has 2900% lower power consumption.

Xeon 638, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Processor N250 and Intel Xeon 638. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Processor N250 is a notebook processor while Xeon 638 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N250
Processor N250
Intel Xeon 638
Xeon 638

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate Processor N250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 638 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Processor N250 and Xeon 638, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.