Xeon w9-3575X vs Processor N200
Aggregate performance score
Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 3278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2106 | 30 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 33.10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Power efficiency | 23.96 | 14.29 |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $3,789 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 44 |
| Threads | 4 | 88 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 97.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 340 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 112 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.58 | 53.38 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 24 August 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 44 |
| Threads | 4 | 88 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 340 Watt |
Processor N200 has 5566.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 3278.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.
The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3575X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
