Xeon 6740E vs Processor N200
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6740E outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 2996% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2369 | 68 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.61 | 6.66 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.86 | 7.33 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 3 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $5,265 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 6740E has 44% better value for money than Processor N200.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Processor N200 and Xeon 6740E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N200 and Xeon 6740E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Xeon 6740E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Processor N200 and Xeon 6740E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Xeon 6740E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Xeon 6740E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Xeon 6740E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.40 | 43.34 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 250 Watt |
Processor N200 has 4066.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6740E, on the other hand, has a 2995.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6740E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6740E is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
