Processor N100 vs Processor N200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.55
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.41
+55.5%

Processor N100 outperforms Processor N200 by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21281779
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency24.6238.28
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$128

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed0.1 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Processor N100.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes99

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N200 1.55
Processor N100 2.41
+55.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N200 3937
Processor N100 4869
+23.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N200 7549
Processor N100 11207
+48.5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Processor N200 3902
Processor N100 4838
+24%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Processor N200 25.99
Processor N100 16.22
+60.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Processor N200 3
Processor N100 4
+54.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N200 219
Processor N100 402
+83.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 113
Processor N100 148
+30.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Processor N200 1.36
Processor N100 1.76
+29.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N200 3.2
+10.3%
Processor N100 2.9

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Processor N200 16
Processor N100 24
+47.9%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Processor N200 80
Processor N100 121
+51.6%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Processor N200 2115
Processor N100 2372
+12.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1540
Processor N100 2829
+83.7%

Blender(-)

Processor N200 2150
+79.4%
Processor N100 1199

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Processor N200 928
Processor N100 986
+6.3%

7-Zip Single

Processor N200 3230
Processor N100 3654
+13.1%

7-Zip

Processor N200 7146
Processor N100 11664
+63.2%

WebXPRT 3

Processor N200 171
+0.2%
Processor N100 171

CrossMark Overall

Processor N200 614
Processor N100 786
+28%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Processor N200 4297
+108%
Processor N100 2067

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Processor N200 1660
Processor N100 3157
+90.2%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Processor N200 956
Processor N100 1222
+27.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 2.41
Integrated graphics card 3.30 2.32

Processor N200 has 42.2% faster integrated GPU.

Processor N100, on the other hand, has a 55.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1349 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.