Processor 300 vs Processor N200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
+189%

Processor 300 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N200 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21231320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Power efficiency24.619.28
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$82

Detailed specifications

Processor N200 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed0.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N200 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 12641700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Processor N200 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes916

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 4.51
Integrated graphics card 3.29 2.86
Recency 3 January 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 46 Watt

Processor N200 has 15% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 189.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N200
Processor N200
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N200 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.