Processor 300 vs Processor N200
Aggregate performance score
Processor 300 outperforms Processor N200 by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Processor N200 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2109 | 1309 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Power efficiency | 24.61 | 9.28 |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | $82 |
Detailed specifications
Processor N200 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N200 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Processor N200 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.45 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 16 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Processor N200 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Processor 300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.56 | 4.51 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.28 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 46 Watt |
Processor N200 has 15.1% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 189.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N200 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
