Athlon 300GE vs Processor N200
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 300GE outperforms Processor N200 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2533 | 2108 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.38 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.93 | 2.96 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Dali (2019−2021) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 7 July 2019 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Processor N200 and Athlon 300GE: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 148 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,500 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N200 and Athlon 300GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N200 and Athlon 300GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Processor N200 and Athlon 300GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N200 and Athlon 300GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N200 and Athlon 300GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N200 and Athlon 300GE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.44 | 2.50 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.13 | 2.76 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 7 July 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Processor N200 has 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 483% lower power consumption.
Athlon 300GE, on the other hand, has a 74% higher aggregate performance score.
The AMD Athlon 300GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N200 is a notebook processor while Athlon 300GE is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
