Ryzen 7 7735U vs Processor N100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 6 Watt
3.29
Ryzen 7 7735U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
13.80
+319%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by a whopping 319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1504493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-Nno data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-NRembrandt-U Refresh
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$128no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads44 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core16
Base clock speed0.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1264FP7
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes920

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N100 3.29
Ryzen 7 7735U 13.80
+319%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 319% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Processor N100 4869
Ryzen 7 7735U 6207
+27.5%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 27% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Processor N100 15207
Ryzen 7 7735U 32220
+112%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 112% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Processor N100 6435
Ryzen 7 7735U 10407
+61.7%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 62% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Processor N100 15.91
Ryzen 7 7735U 5.18
+207%

Processor N100 outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 207% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Processor N100 5
Ryzen 7 7735U 19
+275%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 275% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Processor N100 467
Ryzen 7 7735U 1698
+264%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 264% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Processor N100 152
Ryzen 7 7735U 234
+53.9%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 54% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Processor N100 1.83
Ryzen 7 7735U 2.8
+53%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 53% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Processor N100 2.9
Ryzen 7 7735U 10.2
+252%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 252% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Processor N100 2372
Ryzen 7 7735U 4904
+107%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 107% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Processor N100 34
Ryzen 7 7735U 91
+168%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 168% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Processor N100 173
Ryzen 7 7735U 229
+32.4%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Processor N100 by 32% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.29 13.80
Integrated graphics card 2.34 17.35
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7735U is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N100 and Ryzen 7 7735U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N100
Processor N100
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 772 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 80 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N100 or Ryzen 7 7735U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.