Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Processor N100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.43
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 54 Watt
14.34
+490%

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS outperforms Processor N100 by a whopping 490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1773504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency38.1325.00
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$128no data

Detailed specifications

Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed0.1 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)6 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 1264no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes9no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Processor N100 2.43
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 14.34
+490%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Processor N100 4869
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6888
+41.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Processor N100 11207
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 39399
+252%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Processor N100 4838
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 12948
+168%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Processor N100 4
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 22
+411%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Processor N100 402
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1863
+364%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Processor N100 148
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 249
+68.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Processor N100 1.76
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2.97
+68.8%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Processor N100 2.9
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 10.4
+259%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Processor N100 24
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 110
+354%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Processor N100 121
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 264
+118%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Processor N100 2372
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 6717
+183%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Processor N100 2829
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 8863
+213%

Blender(-)

Processor N100 1199
+344%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 270

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Processor N100 986
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 1748
+77.3%

7-Zip Single

Processor N100 3654
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 5892
+61.3%

7-Zip

Processor N100 11664
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 51096
+338%

WebXPRT 3

Processor N100 171
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 262
+53.3%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Processor N100 2067
+366%
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 444

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Processor N100 3157
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 10200
+223%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Processor N100 1222
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS 2352
+92.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 14.34
Integrated graphics card 2.32 14.94
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 54 Watt

Processor N100 has 800% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, on the other hand, has a 490.1% higher aggregate performance score, 544% faster integrated GPU, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor N100 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor N100
Processor N100
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1313 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor N100 or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.