EPYC 4585PX vs Processor N100
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4585PX outperforms Processor N100 by a whopping 1690% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2083 | 99 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 10.77 | 66.99 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-N | no data |
| Power efficiency | 15.40 | 9.73 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Grado (2025) |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 13 May 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $128 | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 4585PX has 522% better value for money than Processor N100.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Processor N100 and EPYC 4585PX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Processor N100 and EPYC 4585PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1264 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4585PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Processor N100 and EPYC 4585PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4585PX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4585PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz) | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor N100 and EPYC 4585PX.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 24 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.19 | 39.20 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.16 | 1.83 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 13 May 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 170 Watt |
Processor N100 has 18% faster integrated GPU, and 2733% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4585PX, on the other hand, has a 1690% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 4585PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor N100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Processor N100 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4585PX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
