Ultra 7 265F vs Processor 300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1316not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency9.23no data
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size163 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA17001851
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 710N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 65 Watt

Processor 300 has 41.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Processor 300 and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Processor 300
Processor 300
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Processor 300 or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.