Celeron M 330 vs Pro A12-8800B
Primary details
Comparing Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2083 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Carrizo | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 4.38 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 512 KB L2 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.356V |
Compatibility
Information on Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP4 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 24.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | AVX | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| RAID | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3/DDR3L-2133 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | no data |
| iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
| Number of pipelines | 512 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 24 Watt |
Pro A12-8800B has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A12-8800B and Celeron M 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
