i3-6102E vs Pro A10-8700B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro A10-8700B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.39
Core i3-6102E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.48
+6.5%

Core i3-6102E outperforms Pro A10-8700B by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22152154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Core i3
Power efficiency3.765.60
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)12 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data19
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.57 mm2
Number of transistors3100 Million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4no data
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 530
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro A10-8700B 1.39
i3-6102E 1.48
+6.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pro A10-8700B 2212
i3-6102E 2349
+6.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 1.48
Recency 3 June 2015 12 October 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 25 Watt

Pro A10-8700B has 100% more physical cores, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

i3-6102E, on the other hand, has a 6.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-6102E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Pro A10-8700B
Pro A10-8700B
Intel Core i3-6102E
Core i3-6102E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 53 votes

Rate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Core i3-6102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pro A10-8700B or Core i3-6102E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.