Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U vs Phenom X4 9850 (125W)

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataRyzen 3
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateJuly 2008 (16 years ago)7 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size285 mm2no data
Number of transistors450 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom X4 9850 (125W) has 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, on the other hand, has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Phenom X4 9850 (125W) is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W)
Phenom X4 9850 (125W)
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 58 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9850 (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9850 (125W) or Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.