Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) vs Phenom X4 9650

VS

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2404not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.08no data
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)13 August 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size285 mm2258 mm2
Number of transistors450 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt140 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 140 Watt

Phenom X4 9650 has 47.4% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W), on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9650 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9650
Phenom X4 9650
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 225 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 101 vote

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X4 9650 or Phenom II X4 965 BE (140W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.