EPYC 7713P vs Phenom X4 9600B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X4 9600B
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.04
EPYC 7713P
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.17
+4339%

EPYC 7713P outperforms Phenom X4 9600B by a whopping 4339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking258755
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.68
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.468.70
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameAgena (2007−2008)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateApril 2008 (17 years ago)15 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Phenom X4 9600B and EPYC 7713P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm+
Die size285 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors450 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X4 9600B and EPYC 7713P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2+SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9600B and EPYC 7713P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9600B and EPYC 7713P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9600B and EPYC 7713P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9600B and EPYC 7713P.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Phenom X4 9600B 1.04
EPYC 7713P 46.17
+4339%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Phenom X4 9600B 1842
EPYC 7713P 81447
+4322%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 46.17
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 225 Watt

Phenom X4 9600B has 136.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7713P, on the other hand, has a 4339.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7713P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom X4 9600B in performance tests.

Note that Phenom X4 9600B is a desktop processor while EPYC 7713P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X4 9600B
Phenom X4 9600B
AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Phenom X4 9600B and EPYC 7713P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.