Athlon 64 LE-1620 vs Phenom X4 9600
Primary details
Comparing Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2448 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.01 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | November 2007 (17 years ago) | October 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | 230 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2+ | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Phenom X4 9600 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 LE-1620, on the other hand, has 111.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X4 9600 and Athlon 64 LE-1620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
