A6-9200 SoC vs Phenom X4 9550
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2720 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Agena (2007−2008) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | March 2008 (17 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom X4 9550 and A6-9200 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X4 9550 and A6-9200 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2+ | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X4 9550 and A6-9200 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X4 9550 and A6-9200 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X4 9550 and A6-9200 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R4 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X4 9550 and A6-9200 SoC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Phenom X4 9550 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
A6-9200 SoC, on the other hand, has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Phenom X4 9550 and AMD A6-9200 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom X4 9550 is a desktop processor while A6-9200 SoC is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
