Ryzen 3 3200G vs Phenom X3 8650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X3 8650
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.77
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.48
+482%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Phenom X3 8650 by a whopping 482% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26531327
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.90
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency0.776.52
Architecture codenameToliman (2008)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads34
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm12 nm
Die size285 mm2210 mm2
Number of transistors450 million4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X3 8650 0.77
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.48
+482%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom X3 8650 1218
Ryzen 3 3200G 7124
+485%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom X3 8650 252
Ryzen 3 3200G 1076
+327%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom X3 8650 619
Ryzen 3 3200G 3063
+395%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 4.48
Physical cores 3 4
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 3 3200G has a 481.8% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 441.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom X3 8650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8650 and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X3 8650
Phenom X3 8650
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 80 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3193 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X3 8650 or Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.