EPYC 7502P vs Phenom X3 8250e
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7502P outperforms Phenom X3 8250e by a whopping 4651% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3004 | 191 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.37 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.40 | 6.85 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Toliman (2008) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | September 2008 (17 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,300 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Phenom X3 8250e and EPYC 7502P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 285 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom X3 8250e and EPYC 7502P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM2+ | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8250e and EPYC 7502P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8250e and EPYC 7502P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8250e and EPYC 7502P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.61 | 28.98 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 32 |
| Threads | 3 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
Phenom X3 8250e has 176.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7502P, on the other hand, has a 4650.8% higher aggregate performance score, 966.7% more physical cores and 2033.3% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7502P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom X3 8250e in performance tests.
Note that Phenom X3 8250e is a desktop processor while EPYC 7502P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
