3015e vs Phenom II X6 1065T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1065T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.13
+26%

Phenom II X6 1065T outperforms 3015e by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1065T and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18692065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency1.6126.66
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date7 December 2010 (14 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1065T and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads64
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size346 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors904 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1065T and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3FT5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and 3015e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1065T 2.13
+26%
3015e 1.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1065T 3391
+26.7%
3015e 2677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 1.69
Recency 7 December 2010 4 August 2020
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 6 Watt

Phenom II X6 1065T has a 26% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X6 1065T is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Note that Phenom II X6 1065T is a desktop processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1065T and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
Phenom II X6 1065T
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 135 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1065T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 30 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1065T or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.