Core i7-11700F vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Aggregate performance score
i7-11700F outperforms Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) by a whopping 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1526 | 512 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.54 | 35.68 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 1 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $50 | $275 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-11700F has 544% better value for money than Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 50 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i7-11700F outperforms Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) by 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7-11700F outperforms Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) by 324% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.21 | 13.60 |
| Recency | 1 May 2010 | 16 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Core i7-11700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Core i7-11700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
