Celeron M ULV 743 vs Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1578 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | no data |
| Release date | 1 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 6 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2010 | 1 July 2009 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has an age advantage of 10 months.
Celeron M ULV 743, on the other hand, has 850% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop processor while Celeron M ULV 743 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) and Celeron M ULV 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
