Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Phenom II X6 1055T (125W)
Primary details
Comparing Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 55 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 16.94 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 27 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 14 July 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $55 | $2400 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | sWRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 April 2010 | 14 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 32 |
| Threads | 6 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 280 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1055T (125W) and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
