Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE outperforms Phenom II X6 1035T by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2250 | 1246 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.23 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 1.92 | 18.99 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Thuban (2010) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 27 April 2010 (15 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Phenom II X6 1035T and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 35 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 346 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 904 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X6 1035T and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1035T and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.70 | 6.19 |
| Recency | 27 April 2010 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Phenom II X6 1035T has 50% more physical cores.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, on the other hand, has a 264.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 33.3% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Phenom II X6 1035T in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
